"JUDICIAL CORRUPTION"
"They will not tell you that the entire system is corrupt."
"It means that if you are innocent you might go to jail
and vice versa, it means that you may lose your home,
your children, everything you have by a whim of the real
criminals for no good reason, except that the criminals
need your property and your life to make a bigger buck
for themselves.
===
Judicial corruption is now a global problem of enormous proportions for
"the people" of many nations all around the world: albeit that relatively very
few people, at the present time, seem to realise the full extent and the far
reaching consequences of this particularly destructive impediment for so many of
the world's present population of seven billion (or so) people.
Suggestions for all parents:
1) Keep in mind that the present tsunami of judicial corruption in the
United States of America "spread its global wings" some years ago and is now
being mimicked, in the most hidden and deliberately deceitful and cunning ways
possible of course, by the governments and public officials of several other
nations, including those of the Republic of Ireland.
2) Learn about this particularly nefarious form of corruption, and thereby
help to safeguard yourself, your children, and your grandchildren, regarding
this appalling affliction which "humanity as a whole" has already been burdened
with for far too long.
3) Remember: "To be forewarned is to be forearmed".
The text in the first Section below is from the "PARENTS ADVOCATES" dot
"ORG" web site.
=== === ===
The Fixer: No Lawsuits or Proceedings are Won Until You
Have Found the Person Who Pays the Judge
Disbarred attorney (lawyer) Teddy Moore tells America in his book
why judges never look at the facts of a case. All
proceedings are pre-determined according to the "fixer"- the person who gets the settlement/judgement to pay
the judge for his/her services.
The FIXER
by Teddy Moore
PREAMBLE (Random small segments from the book)
This is a tell all book about the unimaginable; the US
people have never been exposed in a movie or a book, to
a corrupt judge, certainly not a corrupt judiciary. The
reality is beyond any fiction or stretch of the
imagination or dream, that those who dispense Justice in
USA, the Judiciary, are the real culprits and the
ordinary criminals and the rest of us, are just victims
of the Judiciary. This is the reality, which is more
bizarre than any fiction. The supporting evidence to
prove this reality comes from the Internet, which has a
short history of about a decade, and without it, the
real criminals would have probably gotten away with this
untold story. Still the people do not get it yet .
In his book “Constitutional chaos” Judge Andrew
Napolitano tries to tell us everything, about several
instances of injustice committed by the government.
Unfortunately, by telling us so much about each
injustice, we ultimately know everything about nothing.
Judge Napolitano describes a tree here and a tree there
but he fails to tell us the story of the forest, and why
it has grown wild .
In “Men in Black”, Author Mark Levin also tried to
describe America’s wild judicial jungle, Mr. Levin tells
us that judges are not God, but he fails to tell us who
they are. He toys with the question of whether or not we
can trust the courts but at the end he is not quite
sure. He reviews a number of Supreme Court decisions and
he tells us that he doesn’t like some of them, but so
what?
The problem is that even those judges and authors who
expose defects in the alleged “The best legal system in
the world” will only describe those defects as
aberrations and abnormalities. They will not tell you
that under the current system, justice is the exception
not the rule. They will not tell you that the judiciary
is responsible for the wild injustice in USA. They will
not tell you that the entire system is corrupt.
It means that if you are innocent you might go to jail
and vice versa, it means that you may lose your home,
your children, everything you have by a whim of the real
criminals for no good reason, except that the criminals
need your property and your life to make a bigger buck
for themselves.
If you ask American attorneys about the judiciary,
they’ll tell you that the system is “Not perfect”. This
admission is actually a great compliment to a system,
which is fundamentally broken and corrupt.
Unfortunately, this is the only criticism that licensed
attorneys are allowed to make about this allegedly great
system (Do Attorneys have a right of free speech? Yes,
if they freely praise judicial corruption as if it is a
gift from God.)
Unlike other books that criticize the American judicial
process, ‘The Fixer’, will show you how the system
really works, why it cannot make a right decision and
why justice in the system is so rare.
‘The Fixer’ will show you that the legal system in USA
is operated by two parties, one who is a fixer-attorney
and the other is an extortable-attorney, appearing
before a presiding Judge, who makes knowingly unjust
decisions in favor of the attorney fixer, and any
appeals on those atrocities are approved by the court of
appeals, all the time (99.99%). This is the broken
mechanism of justice. The American balance of justice
is broken, the judiciary does not weigh anymore anything
on the scale of justice, they just abuse their power to
make a fast buck on it.
In a tribal society in Africa the chief of the tribe
hears evidence and dispenses justice based on the facts,
that he has learned from the witnesses, and there is no
appeal on his decision. This “primitive” form of justice
is far better than what the corrupt US Judiciary has to
offer, the tribal Judge need not the fixer and the extortable, the litigants appear pro se and the outcome
can not be worse then in the alleged “Best legal system
in the world”, because the alleged best system in the
world, is just best in corruption and in concealing the
facts of the extreme corruption. It is just a racket of
extortion to make a quick buck.
The Bar or judiciary won’t endorse ‘The Fixer’ because
this book probes beneath the judicial façade, to expose
the lies and endemic corruption which provide the
American judicial system it’s real foundation. ‘The
Fixer’ will show you why neither congress nor the
constitution can control the judiciary, and why the
media will not tell you about it.
THE EXTORTIONATE ATTORNEY+
The extortionate (Extortable) attorney is a unique
creation of the US legal system. An attorney is a
crucial part of the process providing justice in the
western world, because he is trained in and supposed to
know the law and should be able present it properly to
the judiciary.
However, in USA the judiciary, admits attorneys to
practice law, and discipline attorneys, as a result
American attorneys fear the judiciary, and are therefore
trapped in a built-in conflict of interest between the
duty to represent properly their client in court, and on
the other hand the fear of summary retaliation,
sanctions, disbarment and even summarily jail for just
doing their faithful job for their client.
The American judiciary has extreme abusive power against
attorneys, and in many cases they abuse even the abuse
of power against attorneys, which caused the untenable
situation where an attorney who is paid well to bring
his client’s case to the judiciary, is silenced by a
powerful and corrupt judge who frustrates his job. (Some
of these corrupt judges call themselves “justices of the
court”.) These corrupt judges coerce attorneys to give up
their client’s case to the attorney of the party
opponent, this extortion is called in US courts
“Settlement”,” Stipulation” etc., no matter what they
call it ‘The Fixer’ will show you that it is just an
industry of injustice to make a quick buck of it.
‘The Fixer’ will expose to you an industry of judgments
in exchange for bribes, organized by judges and executed
by their close confidants, the attorney fixer, who can
extort easily the party opponent and his attorney by
threatening him with the pending judicial abuse of
power, which cause the closure of cases in favor of the
attorney fixer without any evidentiary hearing at all.
When an attorney can not present to a judge, without
fear, his client’s case, in such system by definition
you can not get justice, because the judiciary do not
know the facts and sometimes the law, and some believe
that the judiciary do not want to know the law and
facts. So what’s going on here?
Why is it legal in America to pay an attorney fees for
misrepresentation of his client? The simple answer is
that it is part of the show. This is a simple act of
consumer fraud that was institutionalized. Does this
happen in the western world?
Well, in England attorneys are independent of the
judiciary, judges cannot discipline them, they are not
admitted to practice law by the judiciary. English
attorneys are independent from the judiciary, they care
in court for their clients only and are not concerned
with themselves. They are admitted by attorneys and
disciplined by attorney, and so have the respect of the
judiciary and their clients.
In USA an attorney may be disbarred, bankrupt, and on
the way to jail by any judge within ten minutes, when
the judge acts, as complainant, prosecutor, judge, jury
and executioner brings his pretexts, allegations
(Charges) against the attorney and execute him. This
kind of action is possible only in a military regime, or
in a nazi type regime.
The most popular terrorist-acts against American
attorneys by US judiciary is a charge by the Judge that
the attorney raises frivolous allegations or behaves in
a frivolous manner. This is the prelude for any and
every judge to impose, severe penalties, for each and
every such alleged misconduct, which may cause the
bankruptcy of the attorney. (When judges are on the
prowl for more money, there is no point, to tell them
about first amendment rights of free speech, or tell
them about the attorney’s duty to his client.)
Another act of coercion, by the judiciary, against an
attorney may be a simple declaration on record, that the
judge has had enough with this attorney and does not desire to
see anymore this attorney in his courtroom. If this is
drafted as an order of the court, the appellate division
will disbar the attorney from practicing law by
“Reciprocal discipline” and no appeal by the victimized
attorney will be successful, to save the attorney from
this terrorist act. A judge may summarily imprison an
attorney for contempt of court.
© 2005 By Teddy Moore. All rights reserved
Library of Congress Control Number 2005906770
DoItProSe.com Inc. 9/05
...Is it fair to compare the criminal judiciary of the
US to the Nazis? I think it is unfair for the Nazis, but
who cares? To be implicated with this successful mafia
of the judiciary will not add any pride to the Nazis.
They operated in a short period of time (1933-1945) and
were defeated, where the US Judicial Mafia is up and
running for more than a century, committing atrocities
on hundreds of millions and even billions of people, who
lost their life, liberty, property, where is the
comparison with the Nazis? The U.S. criminals are still
the “Honorable Judge”.
The extortable and other
litigants still call the criminals “your honor”, some of
the criminals smile, when they hear this uttering,
addressing the criminals, which means that some of the
criminals still distinguish between the reality and the
conception of distorted reality...
...This is the real Mafia, the Italian mafia has to come
yet to learn how to operate a criminal business, make a
buck of it, and not being subject to any accountability.
There are no good judges and bad judges in a bad system
that requires compliance with corruption. To contact the
publisher: Email:
DoItProSe@nyc.rr.comContact Enjoy reading
THE FIXER: Why is the US Judiciary is so corrupt?
Excerpts from the Book
Newsmaker Interviews
Judge Andrew Napolitano: Fox News' 'Born-again
Individualist'
Interview by Bill Steigerwald
October 27, 2005
Thursday
Judge Andrew Napolitano, who appears as a legal analyst
on more Fox News Channels shows than anyone can count,
is a judge no more. But before he became the most
steadfast defender of civil liberties on TV, Napolitano
was a life-tenured Superior Court judge in New Jersey
who saw the serial abuse of government power every day
in his courtroom.
His 2004 book, "Constitutional Chaos: What Happens When
the Government Breaks Its Own Laws," details those
abuses. With cover-blurbs from both Rush Limbaugh and
Nat Hentoff, it also explains his political journey from
a super-hawkish Richard Nixon supporter during his
undergraduate days at Princeton University in the late
1960s to "a born-again individualist" who says the
Patriot Act is "the most abominable assault on human
liberty by the Congress since the Alien and Sedition
Acts of 1798."
Napolitano, a regular on "The Big Story with John
Gibson" and "The O'Reilly Factor," calls himself "a
small-government Barry Goldwater Republican who believes
in maximum individual liberty." When I talked to him by
phone from his offices in New York on Oct. 5, he was
still underwhelmed by President Bush's nomination of
Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court.
Q: Will Miers hurt or help the health of the
Constitution?
A: That's a great question. I am what people refer to as
an "originalist," meaning I believe the Constitution
means the same thing today as the day it was written. In
fact, the whole purpose of a written constitution is to
prevent it from changing as attitudes and majorities
change. I don't believe that Ms. Miers shares that view.
If she shares the view of the big-government
conservative Republicans, which basically is Congress
can do whatever it wants, then the health of the
Constitution will be impaired by her selection.
On the other hand, if she shares the view that the
Constitution means what it says, that Congress cannot
exceed the 18 specific, enumerated, delegated powers
given to it in the Constitution, and that guaranteed
rights are simply that guarantees then the health of
the Constitution will be enhanced by her selection. But
because she is the stealth candidate, it might be 10
years before we really know how she has affected the
interpretation of the Constitution! [ Note Miers
withdrew on October 26, 2005]
Q: What is the sound-bite synopsis of your book
"Constitutional Chaos"?
A: You and I are having a conversation, Bill, and
there's no judge, no jury, no courtroom, no
stenographer. It is inconceivable that either one of us
would go to jail because of what one of us says to
another. Martha Stewart was having a conversation with
an FBI agent. The FBI agent had a lawyer and she had a
lawyer, but there was no judge, no jury, no courtroom,
no stenographer. During the course of that conversation,
the FBI agent lied to her and she lied to the FBI agent.
Somehow he stayed an FBI agent and she went to jail.
What kind of a government prosecutes its citizens for
committing a crime which its own agents have themselves
committed? One of the reasons I wrote this book, is
because in this era of the war on terror, when more and
more Americans are having contact with their government,
people need to know what their rights are; and people
need to know what the government can get away with; and
people need to know what the government will do when it
wants to get you. Martha Stewart is an unfortunate
example of that.
Q: What's the most important message of your book?
A: That rights are not guaranteed, even though the
Constitution says they are. That government will labor
mightily to make holes in the Constitution to avoid and
evade it. And that a government that breaks its own laws
in the act of prosecuting people is not your friend. It
doesn't have a happy ending, this book. It's filled with
horror stories!
I believe in the natural law, which is that our rights
come from our humanity they don't come from government
and our humanity comes from God. So we have the right
to speak freely, to think freely, to travel and to
associate -- whether or not it's written down and
whether or not the government chooses to protect it,
because those are natural rights that no government in a
popular democracy can take away.
From that it follows that because the government has to
respect those rights, the government itself can't
violate them, thus it can't violate its own laws. But
the government does break its own laws every day and
this book is a catalogue of horror stories in which that
occurs.
Q: You've described yourself as "a born-again
individualist." What's that mean?
A: That means because individuals have immortal souls
and the state does not, the individual is greater than
the state. That means individual rights are guaranteed
and can not be taken away by the legislative or
executive branch, but only by a jury after an individual
has been convicted of a crime. That also means to means
that that government is best that governs least. That
the Constitution means what it says.
But the default position is freedom. We are born in the
state of freedom. Our natural yearnings and urgings are
for freedom. It's natural and integral to all of us.
Government is the negation of freedom. Therefore,
government must be minimal, minimum, precise and
certain. Not a government that thinks it can tax and
regulate any aspect of our lives.
Q: Why aren't you running for president on the
Libertarian Party?
A: Who would vote for me?!
Q: How did you come by these "radical" ideas?
A: After about a year and a half on the bench of trying
criminal cases, I began to see that the Constitution
does not mean what it says to the government. And that
every single government lawyer who came before me,
whether it was jaywalking or murder and everything in
between, seemed to be spending all their time justifying
ways around the Constitution, trying to pull the wool
over my eyes, and claim that the things that the police
did that were so obviously and patently illegal and
unconstitutional were in fact condoned by higher courts.
I began to look at government not as the protector and
preserver of the constitution, but only as advancing the
careers of those in the government. Everyone who works
in the government, from the president to a janitor, from
the governor to a school teacher, takes the same oath:
it's to preserve the Constitution and the rights
guaranteed in it. It's not for victory in the courtroom.
It's not for convicting the bad guys. It's for
preserving the Constitution. I just did not see this in
the hundreds, probably thousands of government lawyers
that appeared before me. It actually caused me to revisit some
of the verities that I had accepted since I was a child.
Q: Such as?
A: Respect for authority. I now think all authority
I'm not talking about my bosses at Fox. I love them
dearly. I'm talking about governmental authority
should be challenged, should be questioned. Because
government is the negation of freedom, when it does
anything, it shouldn't be presumed valid. It should be
presumed invalid. It should have to justify its taking
away of freedom in a constitutional context, rather than
the challenger having to prove that its behavior is
unconstitutional.
Extra questions
Q: Any simple or obvious things we must do to return to
constitutional, limited government or is it hopeless?
A: I think the present environment is hopeless, because
of the sway over Republican members of Congress that the
White House has. Can you imagine if a Democrat had
proposed legislation that allowed the FBI to break into
your house when you're at a basketball game on a Friday
night and steal your checkbook and plant a bug
underneath your toilet and your kitchen table and you'll
never know that the FBI did it? That would allow the FBI
to go to your lawyer, your banker, your doctor, your
pharmacist, and demand your records without a search
warrant? That would allow the FBI to go to a post office
and read your mail without a search warrant without you
knowing about it? If a Democrat had proposed that, the
Republicans in Congress would have railed against it and
opposed it to the skies. But yet the Republicans in this
Congress go along with it, merely because a Republican
president proposes it. I'm speaking, of course, of the
Patriot Act, which is the most abominable assault on
human liberty by the Congress since the Alien and
Sedition Acts of 1798.
Q: Why have we been so willing as a people to give away
out freedoms?
A: Historically, we have always accepted curtailments of
other people's freedom during wartime. During the Civil
War Abraham Lincoln, of course, suspended the writ of
habeas corpus and locked up newspaper editors and a
Republican member of Congress. The public accepted it,
because they didn't think it was they who would be
locked up. During World War I, Attorney General A.
Mitchell Palmer in the Palmer Raids locked up over 1,600
Eastern European Jews from Baltimore to Boston. They
were never charged with crimes. They never saw a judge.
They never saw a jury. They never saw a courtroom. They
were called anarchists.
During World War, not FDR he didn't have the courage
to do it himself had an unknown general in California
lock up 110,000 Japanese Americans not Japanese,
Japanese-Americans -- because of his racist views that
they could not be trusted to enjoy the liberty that the
rest of us had. They were, of course, as American as he
was.
During the present war on terror, about 875
Arab-American males have disappeared from our streets. I
mean literally disappeared. There is no docket. There is
no record of what happened to them in the courtroom. The
dockets have been sealed and the good members of the
press have been denied access to the records of what
happened to these people.
In 1988, a Republican president, Ronald Reagan, and a
Democrat Congress enacted the Civil Liberties Act of
1988, which condemned arresting people without trial;
which condemned incarcerating people on the basis of
their race, ethnicity or religion; which compensated
those still living who had been incarcerated in World
War I or World War II a measly $20,000 a head; and which
proclaimed that this would never happen again in the
American system of government.
But guess what? It has happened again. We never
voluntarily give up our own freedoms, but we accept it
when we have the not-in-my-backyard-attitude that it is
going to happen to someone else.
Bill Steigerwald is a columnist at the Pittsburgh
Tribune- Review.
©Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, All Rights Reserved.
Distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons, Inc.
=== === ===
PARENT ADVOCATES
The text in the section just above is from the following
"PARENT ADVOCATES" www location:
http://www.parentadvocates.org/nicecontent/dsp_printable.cfm?articleID=7020#null
=== === ===
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CONTROL NUMBER 2005906770, FOR "THE
FIXER":
See text at:
https://books.google.ie/books?id=kWwSn9Vjg_QC&pg=PR2&lpg=PR2&dq=Library+of+Congress+Control+Number+2005906770&source=bl&ots=MwEEfREcJi&sig=Y0MJCrRpphWa53MWpj0tFSpDYP4&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj90ubWk73UAhVKD8AKHcWFB8UQ6AEIJDAA#v=onepage&q=Library%20of%20Congress%20Control%20Number%202005906770&f=false
=== === ===
JUDICIAL CORRUPTION AND CRIME IN THE REPUBLIC OF IRELAND
Judicial corruption, crime, Republic of Ireland, William
Finnerty:
https://www.google.ie/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Judicial+corruption,+crime,+Republic+of+Ireland,+William+Finnerty:
=== === ===
REPUBLIC OF IRELAND'S JUDICIARY IS MIMICKING THE JUDICIARY OF
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
'Of course we are every bit as much in need of "regime
change by peaceful and lawful means" here in the
Republic of Ireland, where our own "Regime" is just
mimicking and supporting the "constitution usurpers" of
the US Regime: often in blatant and extremely serious
violation of Article
6.1 of Bunreacht na hEireann (the
Constitution and as such the Supreme Law of the Republic
of Ireland).'
The excerpt just above is from an email dated September
5th 2013 to the United Nations. A full copy of the email
in question can be viewed at:
http://www.humanrightsireland.com/UnitedNations/5September2013/Email.htm
=== === ===
JUDGE GEOFFREY BROWNE (GALWAY), HUMAN RIGHTS IRELAND, WILLIAM
FINNERTY:https://www.google.ie/?gws_rd=ssl#q=JUDGE+GEOFFREY+BROWNE,+HUMAN+RIGHTS+IRELAND,+WILLIAM+FINNERTY:
=== === ===
THE LAW SOCIETY OF NORTHERN IRELAND, HUMAN RIGHTS
IRELAND, WILLIAM FINNERTY:https://www.google.ie/?gws_rd=ssl#q=THE+LAW+SOCIETY+OF+NORTHERN+IRELAND,+HUMAN+RIGHTS+IRELAND,+WILLIAM+FINNERTY:
=== === ===
AN EXAMPLE OF THE WAY WHISTLEBLOWERS
ARE TREATED BY JUDGES AND OTHER PUBLIC OFFICIALS
THE CASE OF
BRADLEY CHARLES BIRKENFELD:
"ONE OF THE MOST SIGNIFICANT WHISTLEBLOWERS IN HISTORY"
FACEBOOK "The record-breaking whistleblowing award came less than
six weeks after Birkenfeld had been paroled from prison
..."
For more on this particular example, please see at
the following www location:
https://www.facebook.com/william.finnerty.3/posts/10212554777087079
=== === ===
UPDATES
June
14th 2017 "UPDATE" message ...
FOR MOST RECENT "HUMAN RIGHTS IRELAND dot COM"
DEVELOPMENTS
AND UPDATES
PLEASE SEE LIST AT:
http://www.humanrightsireland.com/#LIST
=== === ===
ELECTRONIC ATTACHMENT
(Justice for sale)
