"Our
'elected representatives'
(who might not
in reality be in any position to
responsibly and safely represent us at this stage) may now be
foolishly (and/or under
EXTREME pressure perhaps?)
going along with what might be an
equally contrived
'solution' (so called): i.e. borrowing yet more
trillions of
Dollars, Euros, etc. -- which will get them
all much more deeply and disastrously indebted to the
global banker's cartel, and consequently much more
under their control (than they very obviously already appear
to be)."
=============================
"All
part of the plan though" (Tue Apr 21, 2009 20:24) by Gael
Wed Apr 22, 2009
11:09
For me this is perhaps the
most worrying aspect of the whole business, assuming of course
that:
a) The present set of global
financial problems really has been
contrived;
and
b) That
our "
elected representatives" (who might not
in
reality be in any position to responsibly and safely
represent us at this stage) may now be foolishly (and/or under
EXTREME pressure perhaps?) going along with what might
be an
equally contrived "solution" (so called): i.e.
borrowing yet more
trillions of Dollars, Euros,
etc. -- which will get them all much more
deeply and disastrously indebted to the
global banker's
cartel, and consequently much more under their control
(than they very obviously already appear to be)."
In
regard to all this I personally find it very difficult to
dismiss the work and observations of people like the late
Dr Carol Quigley (referred to at Tue Apr 21, 2009
20:24). More on him at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carroll_Quigley
Then, among the living, are the observations and
warnings of people like leading economist and
Nobel
Laureate Dr Joseph Stiglitz: "the
insider-turned-whistleblower par excellence". More
on him via
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Dr+Joseph+Stiglitz%2C+Whistleblower&btnG=Search
Last but not least, there is the matter of the
correct answer
(?) to the the
following question:
"Which Central Banks are NOT
owned by the Rothschilds and
Rockefellars?"For some clues, please see
response to this question at:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Which+Central+Banks+are+NOT+owned+by+the+Rothschilds+and+Rockefellars%3F&btnG=SearchIn
so far as I have been able to establish, it appears the answer
to the above question might be (?) that the only Central Banks
in the world
not under the control of
the
"Rothchilds & Rockefellars & Co" (at the
present time) are those of the following
five nations:
Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Cuba, and Libya. (Source of
this particular piece of
extremely-difficult-to-find
information, which may or may not ??? be reliable, and which
readers need to judge for themselves:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=99477
)
=============================
The above text
has been copied from the following
Indymedia (Ireland)
location:
http://www.indymedia.ie/article/91925#comment250283BACKUP COPY
at:http://www.humanrightsireland.com/IndyMediaIreland/22April2009/Post.htm#22=============================
Global Cesspit of
Corruption, Crime, Cover-Ups, &
Impunity: "The Constitution has been
hijacked" (Registered letter to P.M. Brian Cowan T.D. dated
May 9th 2008):
http://www.humanrightsireland.com/PrimeMinisterCowen/9May2008/Email.htm=============================
For
future reference purposes a copy of the above
text will later today be placed at the following Internet
location:
http://www.humanrightsireland.com/DrAnneJeffers/22April2009/Email.htm
=============================
Human Rights
(Ireland):
http://www.humanrightsireland.com=============================
