Recent articles by Brian Adderly
This author has not submitted any other articles.
Recent Articles about National Crime and Justice

CEHG WORKSHOP 2009 Jan 17 09 by Most Rev Dr Michael D Hynes OMD

Republican fundraising frolics at the Grand Canal on Christmas day. Dec 25 08 by Paula Geraghty

Assaults on UCD Students by SecurityGuards Dec 13 08 by Lapwing

Global Banking Crisis

category national | crime and justice | opinion/analysis author Friday January 16, 2009 18:12author by Brian Adderly Report this post to the editors

Private banks that pretend to be state controlled

Banking fraud now desperately needs to be revisited.

"Perhaps the assassination of JFK was a warning to future presidents who would think to eliminate the U.S. debt by eliminating the Federal Reserve's control over the creation of money."

"Mr. Kennedy challenged the two most successful vehicles that have ever been used to drive up debt - war and the creation of money by a privately-owned central bank."

From: http://www.john-f-kennedy.net/executiveorder11110.htm

This whole fraudulent business now desperately needs to be revisited.

President-elect Obama could try to rid the world of this massive and extremely dangerous scam (just as former President John F. Kennedy tried to do) - but will he?

Related link: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Executive+Order+01111%2C+John+F+Kennedy&btnG=Search

author by Carolinepublication date Fri Jan 16, 2009 18:21Report this post to the editors

"BARACK OBAMA ENTHUSIASTS who were angered by the appointment of Rahm Emanuel as chief of staff, are hoping Obama will 'pull a JFK' and work around Emanuel—a hawkish advocate for Israel—and those powerful pro-Israel families in Chicago who helped elect Obama."

From http://people.boston.com/forums/news/national/general/?p=discussiondetails&activityid=7397721706654373083

Related link: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Money+Masters%2C+JFK%2C+Obama&btnG=Search

author by Questionerpublication date Fri Jan 16, 2009 18:30Report this post to the editors

Is the "Bank of Ireland" a private bank in reality?

Similarly regarding the "Bank of England" (for example)?

author by Jonpublication date Fri Jan 16, 2009 18:43Report this post to the editors

The truth will scare you!

See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThXpjmfyiMQ

author by Bankerpublication date Fri Jan 16, 2009 22:22Report this post to the editors

The banking and accounting system is one of the world's great inventions.

It fuels the engine of industry and commerce.

It is one of the great gifts bequeathed to us by the Italian Renaissance.

(Though this fact often ignored in history books of the Renaissance.)

It's abused often...but isn't everything abused when there are crooks and charlatans around.
.

author by Bankerpublication date Fri Jan 16, 2009 22:37Report this post to the editors

The Bank of England was nationalised in 1946:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_England

The Bank of Ireland is private (Like the Bank of Scotland.)

The BOI is private FOR NOW anyway !!!!!

author by Peterpublication date Sat Jan 17, 2009 10:36Report this post to the editors

To Banker:

"Most richer countries today have an 'independent' central bank, that is, one which operates under rules designed to prevent political interference. Examples include the European Central Bank (ECB) and the Federal Reserve System in the United States. Some central banks are publicly owned, and others are privately owned. For example, the Reserve Bank of India is publicly owned and directly governed by the Indian government. The major difference is that government owned central banks do not charge the taxpayers interest on the national currency, whereas privately owned central banks do charge interest." (From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_bank )

"designed to prevent political interference"?

If the elected representatives cannot interfere with the running of central banks (in the US for example), how can that be democratic?

Where do the privately owned central banks get the money from to lend to governments? -- having due regard for the fact that there are numerous reports on the Internet which claim they simply (and brazenly!!) "invent it out of thin air", and then have the cheek to charge the governments interest (compound interest no doubt?) for their fraudulent invention: which the tax payer then gets saddled with (or crippled with as the case may be)?

Related link: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&fkt=2297&fsdt=15125&q=Money+out+of+thin+air&btnG=Google+Search&aq=o&oq=

author by Gaylepublication date Sat Jan 17, 2009 12:33Report this post to the editors

"Money is the creature of law and the creation of the original issue of money should be maintained as the exclusive monopoly of national Government."

"The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of Government, but it is the Governments greatest creative opportunity."

"The taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest, discounts, and exchanges. The financing of all public enterprise, the maintenance of stable Government and ordered progress, and the conduct of the Treasury will become matters of practical administration. The people can and will be furnished with a currency as safe as their own Government. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity. Democracy will rise superior to the money power."

Shortly after the above statements appeared in his Monitory Policy of 1865 (see at http://www.john-f-kennedy.net/executiveorder11110.htm ), United States of America President Abraham Lincoln was assassinated.

Related link: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&fkt=16110&fsdt=21625&q=Abraham+Lincoln%27s+Monetary+Policy%2C+1865+%28Page+91+of+Senate+document+23.%29&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2009 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy